Bottom line: The TikTok appears to refer to Justice Kevin D. Loo of the Supreme Court of British Columbia and media reporting about Karandeep Singh’s Prince George sexual-assault guilty plea/sentencing. The TikTok’s private-family allegations and threats are not republished here.
What the TikTok says, safely summarized
The user-supplied TikTok, from @theprotector316, addresses “a certain judge of Prince George BC” and criticizes an alleged sexual-assault sentencing outcome involving a young woman. The clip also includes abusive language and private-family allegations. CanadianJudges.ca treats the TikTok as a social-media lead only, not as proof.
Likely public case identified
Accessible reporting and public discussion point to the Karandeep Singh Prince George sexual-assault sentencing. Rebel News reported on July 10, 2026 that Karandeep Singh, 24, pleaded guilty on June 30 to sexually assaulting a woman in Prince George on June 13, 2024. Rebel reported that B.C. Supreme Court Justice Kevin Loo accepted a joint sentencing submission for 170 days of house arrest followed by 18 months of probation.
Rebel further reported that Justice Loo chose not to place Singh on the national sex-offender registry after hearing that Singh faced potential immigration consequences. The article says Justice Loo noted Singh had been in Canada since 2023, had no prior criminal record, was married, employed as a hotel security guard, had pleaded guilty, and cooperated with police.
Official judge identification
The B.C. Supreme Court official roster lists Justice Kevin D. Loo (Vancouver) and states he was appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia on October 24, 2022. The roster also lists him among the Vancouver justices.
Evidence limits
- CanLII was CAPTCHA-blocked and no official written sentencing reasons were retrieved in this pass.
- Prince George Citizen appears to have local coverage but was Cloudflare-blocked in automated review; it is not quoted here.
- Rebel News is used as accessible media reporting, not as an official court record.
- No finding of judicial misconduct is stated.
- Private-family allegations in the TikTok are excluded from the public source trail.